International Journal of Cancer

Background Conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer is supported by a pooled overall survival hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.40) and, in the largest international cohort, median survival of 36.7 versus 12.5-13.8 months on chemotherapy. Survival is measured from diagnosis; the median diagnosis-to-gastrectomy interval is 124 days, which patients must survive to be counted surgical. Methods We simulated cohorts of 3,177 stage IV gastric cancer patients from published parameters: background median survival 14.5 months; median diagnosis-to-surgery interval 124 days (category-specific 92-174 days). Surgery had no effect (true hazard ratio 1.00 by construction). Data were analysed as the literature analyses them (exposure fixed at baseline, follow-up from diagnosis), and by time-varying Cox and landmark analysis. Confounding by indication was added in a second scenario. Results Under immortal time bias alone the naive analysis returned a hazard ratio of 0.794 (95% simulation interval 0.743-0.851), median survival 16.8 versus 12.8 months. Time-varying Cox recovered 1.000 and landmark analysis 1.000-1.004. Bias scaled with the interval: 0.849 at 92 days, 0.715 at 174 days. Adding confounding, the naive estimate fell to 0.601 (0.560-0.644) at strength 0.5 and 0.356 (0.323-0.385) at strength 1.5, overlapping the published estimate; median survival 21.9 versus 8.7 months. Correcting immortal time alone left residual bias (hazard ratio 0.439). Conclusions The reported survival advantage of conversion surgery is reproducible where the operation does nothing; published estimates cannot distinguish benefit from bias. Resolving this requires individual patient data analysed with methods that assign person-time correctly, or completion of JCOG2301.

Background: Evidence suggests chronic distress influences ovarian cancer (OC) etiology and metabolomic profiles. Here, we evaluated the association of a metabolite-based distress score (MDS) and OC risk. Methods: We included two matched case-control studies nested within the Nurses' Health Studies (N=584) and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (N=348). Metabolites were measured 3-27 years before diagnosis using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We examined the association of quintiles of MDS and 19 constituent metabolites with OC risk using unconditional logistic regression and stratified by tumor histotype, menopausal status, and age at diagnosis. Results: We observed women in the highest versus lowest quintile of MDS had an increased OC risk (OR=1.62,95%CI=1.03-2.54,ptrend=0.07), and type 2 tumors (OR=1.71,95%CI=1.03-2.83,ptrend=0.11). Associations were suggestively stronger for premenopausal and <69-year-old women, and driven by pseudouridine, and N2,N2-dimethylguanosine. Conclusion: Our findings suggest chronic distress-associated metabolic dysregulation may represent a novel OC risk factor, especially among younger women.

Importance: Chronic stress may contribute to adverse health outcomes through cumulative physiologic dysregulation. Allostatic load (AL), a composite measure of multisystem physiologic burden, may capture biologic effects of structural, social, and psychosocial stress not reflected by self-reported measures. Objective: To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in AL among women with familial cancer risk and examine how socioeconomic status, psychosocial factors, clinical characteristics, and health behaviors contribute to variations in AL. Design: Cross-sectional study of underrepresented minority participants enrolled in the HERSTORY cohort from October 2023 through September 2025, with comparison participants from the UCLA ATLAS biobank. Setting: UCLA academic health system. Participants: The study included 303 racially and ethnically diverse female HERSTORY participants aged [&ge;]35 years with a family history of cancer and matched non-Hispanic White female ATLAS participants (n=709). Exposures: Race and ethnicity, age, neighborhood deprivation, cancer history and stage, depression, perceived stress, cancer worry, and physical activity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was AL, calculated from cardiometabolic and organ-function measures. A secondary index incorporated race- and ethnicity-specific neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) derived from 326,826 women in the UCLA Health population. Multivariable regression models evaluated factors associated with elevated AL. Results: Compared with matched non-Hispanic White participants, Black and Asian/Pacific Islander HERSTORY participants had significantly higher AL after adjustment. Hispanic/Latina participants did not have significantly elevated AL. Older age, greater area-level socioeconomic deprivation, and depression were independently associated with higher AL. Prior cancer diagnosis, cancer worry and perceived stress were not significantly associated with AL, whereas regular physical activity was associated with lower AL. Among cancer patients, advanced stage was associated with greater AL. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates elevated AL among understudied racial/ethnic minority groups with familial cancer risk and identifies associations with neighborhood deprivation, depression, and physical activity. The association between cancer stage and AL suggests that physiologic stress may reflect variation in cancer burden. The lack of association with perceived stress and cancer worry further indicates that physiologic and self-reported psychosocial measures capture distinct dimensions of stress. The development of race/ethnicity-specific NLR thresholds derived from large population samples provide a benchmark for future studies.

To evaluate the cost-utility and 5-year budget impact of first-line olaparib plus abiraterone versus abiraterone alone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in China after the eleventh round of volume-based procurement (VBP). The intention-to-treat (ITT) population was assigned primary decision-analytic weight; the prespecified BRCA1/2-mutated (BRCAm) subgroup was a supporting analysis.

Background: Prostate cancer enzalutamide treatment is approved at a standard dose of 160 mg daily. Concerns for real-world patients -- older and more fragile than those enrolled in clinical trials -- have prompted consideration of initiating treatment with lower doses, but the long-term efficacy of this approach remains unknown. We evaluate the long-term survival and longevity in patients treated with standard versus upfront low-dose enzalutamide. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 151 patients treated with enzalutamide (102 receiving 160 mg; 49 receiving [&le;]80 mg) between 2014--2021 at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, with complete follow-up through end of life (98.7% completeness of follow-up). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and longevity (attained age). Results: Doses [&le;]80 mg were associated with longer median OS (36.3 vs. 20.7 months), improved restricted mean OS (difference of 0.7 years, p=0.05), and enhanced longevity (median 82.5 vs. 78.3 years, p=0.004). PSA response rate at 12 weeks was higher with lower-dose (71.4% vs. 48.8%, p=0.016). In multivariable models adjusted for prognostic factors, [&le;]40 mg compared with 160 mg was non-inferior regarding OS (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.36--1.06), superior regarding PFS (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.35--0.99), and superior regarding longevity (HR=0.48, 95% CI 0.28--0.84). Bone metastasis, poor performance status, PSA response, time to PSA nadir, and disease duration were independent predictors of outcomes. A post-hoc analysis revealed a strong association between dose and physician-prescribing profiles, ranging from "endorse-lowest-dose" to "never-deviate-from-full-dose". Conclusions: Lower doses of enzalutamide were non-inferior to full-dose. Dose-adapted strategies warrant further investigation.

Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-40% of men after radical prostatectomy. Existing postoperative recurrence risk tools based on PSA and pathology are clinically useful but show only moderate and variable discrimination, highlighting the need for biomarkers that improve risk stratification and consequent treatment decisions. We hypothesized that the prostate microenvironment, including both the tumor and non-cancerous adjacent tissue, may contain prognostic features associated with adverse postoperative PSA outcomes. Methods: We assembled a cohort of matched tumor-adjacent benign and tumor prostate tissue from 243 men across three institutions to establish a discovery cohort (n=123; 43 postoperative PSA events, 35%) and validation cohort (n=120; 46 events, 38%). For primary binary analyses, a postoperative PSA event included BCR, defined as two consecutive postoperative PSA values >=0.2 ng/mL, or PSA persistence. We performed RNA sequencing of matched tumor-adjacent benign and tumor tissues, quantified immune signatures, and developed an integrated model combining the adjacent-tissue B-cell signature, preoperative PSA, and radical prostatectomy Gleason score (BRIGADE). CAPRA-S-adjusted Cox analyses excluding recurrence-time-0 cases evaluated time to BCR, and CD19 multiplex immunofluorescence provided tissue-level confirmation (n=10). Results: In prostatectomy specimens, tumors from patients without a postoperative PSA event were enriched for B-cell transcriptional programs, whereas tumors from event-positive patients showed elevated proliferation signatures. B-cell-related transcriptional programs were correlated between tumor and adjacent tissue. Tumor-adjacent benign B-cell scores were higher in no-event cases and discriminated postoperative PSA-event status in PCBN discovery (AUC 0.63) and BM validation (AUC 0.81) cohorts, outperforming numerous other immune-related signatures. In CAPRA-S-adjusted Cox sensitivity analyses excluding recurrence-time-0 cases, higher adjacent-tissue B-cell activity was associated with reduced recurrence risk in PCBN (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.94; BH-adjusted p=0.035) and BM (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.95; BH-adjusted p=0.034). Tissue-based validation showed that CD19+ B-cell density in adjacent benign tissue was higher in no-event than event-positive patients (median 0.1145 vs 0.0471; p=0.008). BRIGADE achieved an AUC of 0.68 in cross-validation and 0.83 in independent validation, compared to AUCs of 0.54-0.63 and 0.44-0.78 for the tested clinical predictors, respectively. At the fixed classification threshold, the validation-cohort odds ratio for BRIGADE was 2.75. The adjacent B-cell score remained associated with lower odds of a postoperative PSA event after adjustment for PSA and Gleason score. Conclusions: B-cell infiltration in tumor-adjacent benign prostate tissue may complement existing clinicopathologic models for stratifying adverse postoperative PSA outcomes and subsequent BCR after radical prostatectomy. The transcriptomic signal was recapitulated by CD19-based tissue staining, supporting further development of a pathology-based assay.

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard-of-care therapy for many solid malignancies, yet predictive biomarkers of treatment response remain limited. We identified a germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in an intrinsically disordered region of the lysine demethylase KDM3C/JMJD1C (p.S464T) that is associated with CRT outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). In silico modeling with AlphaFold predicted S464T substitution influenced interaction between phosphorylated KDM3C and RNF8 FHA domain. In cellular models, conversion of S464 to T464 increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. S464T substitution impaired damage-induced MDC1-RAP80 signaling and downstream RAP80-BRCA1 colocalization. SNP carrying cells impaired DNA repair causing genotoxic stress that is associated with increased cGAS-cGAMP innate immune signaling and increased apoptosis. Population analyses with the SNP highlighted an increase incidence of UV-induced skin and other cancers, linking inherited variation in the chromatin regulatory gene KDM3C to genome instability, cancer risk, and therapeutic vulnerability.

IMPORTANCE: A recent meta-analysis showed that chemoimmunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) [&ge;] 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether this benefit reflects chemotherapy effect or ICI heterogeneity remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To reassess the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to ICI monotherapy using agent-stratified comparisons anchored to chemotherapy. DATA SOURCES: The 24 phase 3 randomized clinical trials included in the original meta-analysis (search date, August 3, 2025). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from each trial in the original meta-analysis. Two analytic frameworks were used: within-agent comparisons (same ICI in both chemoimmunotherapy and monotherapy) and across-agent comparisons (ICI in one treatment strategy only). For within-agent comparisons, a two-stage random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. In stage 1, ICI-specific HRs for chemoimmunotherapy and ICI monotherapy versus chemotherapy were pooled and their ratio was calculated (RHR = HRchemoimmuno/HRmono; RHR < 1 favors chemoimmunotherapy). The RHRs were pooled in stage 2. For across-agent comparisons, RHR was derived from pooled HRs by treatment strategy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Endpoints were OS and PFS. RESULTS: In within-agent comparisons (4 ICIs; 13 trials; N = 3252), pooled RHR was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78-1.13; P = .48; I2 = 0.0%) for OS and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.06; P = .14; I2 = 0.0%) for PFS. In across-agent comparisons (7 ICIs; 11 trials; N = 2231), RHR favored chemoimmunotherapy for OS (0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92; P = .01) and PFS (0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.58; P < .001). In a sensitivity analysis restricted to trials of NCCN-recommended regimens, pooled RHR was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.81-1.28; P = .87) for OS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the within-agent comparisons, adding chemotherapy to ICI monotherapy did not improve OS or PFS in patients with PD-L1 TPS [&ge;] 50% advanced NSCLC. The benefit in the original meta-analysis appears driven by across-ICI heterogeneity. These findings are consistent with ICI monotherapy as a standard first-line option and underscore the need for agent-level stratification in across-trial comparisons.

Background: Primary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCTs) are rare and histologically heterogeneous. Objective: To compare demographics, specific ICD-O-3 morphologies, first-course treatment patterns, annual registered case counts, and unadjusted overall survival between soft-tissue and hematologic PMCTs. Methods: We identified 730 PMCT cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2021 in SEER 18 (ICD-O-3 topography C38.0). Histologic lineage was assigned from ICD-O-3 morphology. Comparative analyses included soft-tissue (n=458) and hematologic (n=212) tumors. First-course variables were primary-site surgery, chemotherapy (yes versus no/unknown), and radiotherapy (radiation versus none/unknown). Groups were compared with chi-square tests. Overall survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods; follow-up was truncated at 120 months. Results: Soft-tissue PMCTs occurred predominantly at ages 45-64 years (67.9%), whereas hematologic PMCTs occurred predominantly at age [&ge;]65 years (63.2%; p<0.001). Men comprised 59.9% of hematologic and 49.3% of soft-tissue cases (p=0.014). The leading soft-tissue morphology was hemangiosarcoma/angiosarcoma (ICD-O-3 9120/3; 201/458, 43.9%); synovial sarcoma accounted for 20/458 cases (4.4%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS, accounted for 131/212 hematologic tumors (61.8%). Any primary-site surgery was recorded in 66.6% of soft-tissue versus 15.6% of hematologic cases (p<0.001). Chemotherapy was recorded in 67.5% versus 51.1% (p<0.001), and radiotherapy in 9.0% versus 20.5% (p<0.001). In exploratory Kaplan-Meier analyses, hematologic patients with recorded chemotherapy had higher unadjusted 120-month overall survival than those without recorded chemotherapy (42.0% versus 12.2%; log-rank p=7.5x10-). Radiation-associated survival differences were not statistically significant in either lineage. Conclusions: Soft-tissue and hematologic PMCTs have distinct age distributions, named histologies, and first-course treatment patterns in SEER. These findings describe registry coding and do not establish treatment effectiveness or population incidence.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of somatic variants has become the method of choice in a variety of molecular oncology fields and in the clinic. Its use ranges from sequencing entire tumor genomes and transcriptomes to targeted clinical diagnostic gene panels. The NYU Langone Genome PACT (Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets, LG-PACT) assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test that uses targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue matched with normal specimens from patients to detect gene alterations in a targeted panel covering 606 genes and the TERT promoter. Indications for testing are cancer (solid tumors and hematological malignancies) where a mutational profile from multiple genes would be informative for disease stratification, prognosis, or treatment options including targeted therapies and eligibility for clinical trials. The test is intended to provide information on somatic mutations including point mutations, small insertions/deletions (indels), and copy number aberrations for diagnostic and treatment decisions. LG-PACT is a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared diagnostic test (510K: K202304). The clinical interpretation of sequencing data of molecular tumor markers from NGS encompasses automated variant calling tools with human interpretation. This final mostly manual review of data step is intensive, involving highly trained scientists, encompassing literature review, interpretation and clinical tier classification by pathologists, who then provide a complete molecular diagnostic report to the treating oncologists. We provide analysis of 1339 clinical genomic profiles from 31 different cancers and their subtypes, comprising of central nervous system (CNS) 792 (59%) cases (incl. meningioma, glioma and glioblastoma), with 267 (20%) cases predominantly of lung, pancreatic and colorectal and 280 of others (21%). Here, we present the technical challenges of validating an NGS oncological diagnostic targeted assay for clinical grade accuracy and sensitivity for patient care. We show how copy number alterations provide a more comprehensive description of the tumors genomic profile. We then outline the utility of targeted panel sequencing based on certified pathologist selection of reportable variants for our current patient cohort. Where analysis of variant detection has led to 49.4% (661/1339) of our clinical tumor samples containing mutations in known therapy targeted genes, 35.6% (477/1339) with mutation detected in other genes, and 15% (201/1339) cases being negative.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have shown great promise in treating bladder cancer and are now part of the standard treatment for advanced disease. However, many patients still fail to respond to treatment and at present many biomarkers are assessed but have yet shown only limited results. Therefore, with the advent of combination treatments and the increase of immune related adverse event, the search for reliable predictive biomarkers is paramount. Using a multiplexed enhanced FRET-FLIM based technique (QF-Pro) we quantified the interaction of PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4/CD80 and TIGIT/CD155 immune checkpoints in a pre-treatment TMA of 46 patients treated with atezolizumab. The association between higher PD-1/PD-L1 ICP interaction state and treatment efficacy was demonstrated in the male sample cohort, where it identified patients with better PFS. Conversely, patients exhibiting higher CTLA-4/CD80 engagement had a worse response to atezolizumab. Remarkably, the dual assessment of patients with high PD-1/PD-L1 and low CTLA-4/CD80 allowed to identify the best responders. These results indicate that the monitoring of patients immune profile in urothelial carcinoma might be critical in identifying patients who may benefit from combination therapy.

Purpose/Objective There is paucity of data reporting outcomes of breast cancers with initial internal mammary nodal involvement and no visceral metastases, treated with curative hypofractionated radiotherapy . We report the outcomes from a tertiary centre alongside spatial patterns of recurrences in the above group Material/Methods For this retrospective cross-sectional study, consecutive patients contoured as per the ESTRO 2013 guidelines, treated between 2016-2022 were eligible if their diagnostic imaging demonstrated involvement of the internal mammary nodes. Radiotherapy (40 Gy/15#/3 weeks) was delivered to the residual breast / thoracic wall, SCF region corresponding to the ESTRO lymph node level 4 and internal mammary chain nodes. Residual IMN/ level 4 nodes received a boost of 10Gy/5#. Spatial mapping of sites of recurrence at the local site and three nodal sites (axilla, SCF and IMN) was performed using deformable image registration. Sites of recurrence at the local site and three nodal levels were contoured separately. Volumetric intersection of the recurrent gross tumour volume (GTV_recurrence) with treated clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated. Actuarial overall (OS), disease free survival (DFS) & cumulative incidence of local (LR), regional (RR) and loco-regional recurrence(LRR) were calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Univariate comparison of outcomes with or without residual disease was performed using the log rank test. Results The median age of the 61 eligible women was 49 years. 77% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the rest adjuvant chemotherapy. 82% patients had a mastectomy. Axillary lymph node dissection was done in 96.7%. Boosts to residual IMN and SCF nodes were delivered to 21(34.4%) and 2 (3.3%) respectively. Median follow up was 3.6 years. Out of the 61 patients, 42 patients were disease free with an estimated 3 year disease free survival of 75% (95% CI 64, 88%). Spatial mapping of locoregional recurrence was possible in all but 1 patient with local (only) recurrence who was lost to follow-up after mammogram only. Among the patients with loco regional recurrence 1 had recurrence in local site + SCF +axilla, 3 had recurrence in the SCF+axilla, 2 in the SCF+IMN and 1 in the axilla+SCF+IMN. Only one patient had isolated axillary recurrence or isolated SCF recurrence. There were no IMN only recurrences. Among the 8 patients with nodal recurrence, a total of 27 individual GTV_recurrence were identified in the axilla(n=11), SCF(n=11) and IMN (n=5). IMN recurrences showed complete or partial overlap with CTV. SCF recurrences were a mix with predominantly in-field recurrences while axillary recurrences occurred outside the treated volume.Four (6.6%) patients had Grade 2 lymphoedema as documented late side effect. Conclusion Aggressive treatment of IMN disease with adjuvant radiation is effective with good locoregional control. Systemic recurrences are common and may benefit from intensification strategies.

Background: Immunochemotherapy (ICT) is considered standard in regards to care for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in extensive stages, yet reliable biomarkers for treatment response remain elusive. While previous univariate analyses suggest specific peripheral lymphocyte subsets correlate with survival, the systemic immune response involves complex, multivariate interactions that require advanced analytical approaches. Methods: This paper analysed high-dimensional flow cytometry data from 32 patients with stage IV SCLC treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Peripheral blood was analysed at baseline (V0) and longitudinally during treatment. To identify potential early predictive biomarkers and mitigate sample attrition in later cycles, we focused on baseline and measurements after two cycles of ICT (V1). We employed a rigorous machine learning framework utilising nested cross-validation, bootstrapping, and permutation-based statistical testing to evaluate eleven different regression and survival models. Results: Under model-appropriate metrics, regressors did not generalise (R2 <0); conversely, censoring-aware Random Survival Forests (RSF) successfully extracted robust prognostic signatures. Baseline immune profiles (V0) achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.66 (p= 0.015), while dynamic changes from V0 to V1 ({triangleup}V) achieved a C-index of 0.65 (p= 0.022). Crucially, absolute values measured after two cycles of ICT (V1) yielded no significant signal (p= 0.445). Feature importance analysis confirmed the prognostic value of Th17 normalisation and identified Naive Regulatory T cells and Memory B cells as candidate components. Conclusion: Machine learning validation confirms a predictive signal in the peripheral immune profile of SCLC patients. Early dynamic shifts in the balance between regulatory and effector immune arms are associated with prognosis, contrasting with the lack of signal in absolute counts after two cycles of ICT. These findings establish a proof of concept for multivariate liquid biopsy immune profiling, warranting confirmation in larger cohorts and highlighting the necessity of integrating systemic and tumour-intrinsic data.

Purpose: This study assesses the association between colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and a validated, housing-based measure of individual-level socioeconomic status (SES, called HOUSES hereafter) within rural communities and determines whether HOUSES-integrated geospatial analysis can be used to tailor interventions. Methods: We used CRC screening data from a subset of Mayo Clinic Midwest patients living in cities without ready access to routine care in the Mayo Clinic Health System in 2019 to represent rural communities. At the individual level, we assessed the association between CRC screening rates and the HOUSES index, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, distance from home address to clinic, and area deprivation index, using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model. Additionally, we conducted geospatial analysis to examine the correlation between hotspots of 1) lower CRC screening rates and 2) lower SES of the subject population (HOUSES quartile 1). Findings: Among 34,489 individuals (median age 64.0 years, 52.4% female), those with the lowest SES (HOUSES Q1) had 37% lower odds of being CRC screening adherent than those with the highest SES (HOUSES Q4) (adj. OR [95% CI]: 0.63 [0.58-0.69]). In the 14 identified HOUSES Q1 hotspots, there was a significant correlation in counts of HOUSES Q1 and low CRC screening (correlation coefficient=0.81). Conclusion: Lower SES was significantly associated with lower CRC screening among rural populations. HOUSES-enabled geospatial analysis identified geographic hotspots with lower CRC screening rates for targeted interventions to address disparities in CRC screening in rural communities. HOUSES may be a useful digital tool for cancer preventive care and research.

Motivation: Cell-free DNA methylation provides a minimally invasive signal for early cancer detection and tissue-of-origin prediction. Most methods represent methylation measurements as independent fixed-window features and therefore do not explicitly model relationships among genomic regions. Results: We developed PANGEM (Pan-cancer Graph-based Cancer Detection Using the Cell-free DNA Methylome), a graph-learning framework that represents genomic bins as nodes and integrates CpG context, genomic proximity, and sample-specific methylation similarity in the graph topology. Across five repeated stratified train-test splits, PANGEM achieved the highest mean performance among evaluated methods, with an AUROC/AUPR of 0.997/1.000 for binary cancer detection and macro-AUROC/AUPR of 0.977/0.870 for multiclass tissue-of-origin prediction. In the independent INSPIRE cohort, 72 of 78 cancer cases (92.3%) exceeded the binary classification threshold, and PANGEM correctly classified 9 of 17 head and neck cancer cases (52.9%), the highest accuracy among evaluated methods. Subnetwork analysis further identified recurrent, graph-connected methylation patterns, including a 111-DMR subnetwork with increased methylation in cancer samples.

Background Late-stage cancer incidence is being considered as an earlier endpoint in cancer-screening trials, but its trial-level association with cancer-specific mortality may depend on evidence selection and endpoint harmonization. We evaluated the robustness of this association to source-verified additions. Methods We reconstructed the PubMed corpus underlying a 41-comparison review. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview was used only to prioritize reports for blinded human reassessment. Reviewers determined eligibility, linked reports from the same trial, harmonized endpoints, and verified comparison-level data. We recalculated unweighted Pearson correlations overall and by cancer type after adding earliest-compatible trial comparisons. Results Among 1209 candidate records, 996 PDFs were assessed. Thirty-three reports absent from the source review were prioritized; 26 were eligible, representing 18 trials, and 8 provided compatible comparisons. Adding these comparisons increased the dataset from 41 to 49 and attenuated the overall correlation from 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55 to 0.85) to 0.59 (95% CI = 0.37 to 0.75). Updated correlations were 0.49 (95% CI = -0.26 to 0.87) for breast, -0.23 (95% CI = -0.71 to 0.40) for colorectal, and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.95) for lung cancer. One sparse-event comparison influenced the colorectal estimate. Conclusions The overall association was sensitive to evidence composition, and cancer-specific stability varied. Late-stage incidence should be evaluated by cancer type and with prespecified sensitivity analyses for evidence selection and endpoint definitions. Model-assisted prioritization cannot replace human eligibility review, trial reconciliation, and source verification.

Objective: To examine how medial plantar nerve shear wave speed (Cs) and viscosity coefficient (Vi) are associated with the severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and to assess their ability to differentiate adjacent severity categories. Materials and Methods: Based on TCSS, the 113 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were assigned to the non-DPN (n = 33), mild DPN (n = 46), and moderate DPN (n = 34) groups. Medial plantar nerve Cs and Vi were measured using shear wave elastography and viscosity imaging. Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated Cs, Vi, and their logistic regression-based combination; areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared using DeLong tests. Results: Cs and Vi increased progressively across the three groups (both P < 0.001). For non-DPN versus mild DPN, the AUCs of Cs, Vi, and the combined model were 0.688 (95% CI, 0.604-0.772), 0.741 (0.660-0.822), and 0.745 (0.665-0.826), respectively, without significant pairwise differences. For mild versus moderate DPN, the corresponding AUCs were 0.707 (0.625-0.789), 0.794 (0.724-0.865), and 0.799 (0.731-0.867). The combined model outperformed Cs (P = 0.045), whereas Cs versus Vi and Vi versus the combined model did not differ significantly (P = 0.162 and 1.000, respectively). Conclusion: Medial plantar nerve Cs and Vi increased with DPN severity. Their combination improved discrimination between mild and moderate DPN compared with Cs alone but not with Vi alone. Quantitative medial plantar nerve viscoelastic assessment may complement clinical severity grading.

Background: Many at-risk patients lack access to genetic services due to a genetic counselor (GC) workforce shortage. Little is known about how digital alternatives impact patients with and without cancer who meet criteria for genetic testing. Methods: eREACH2 is a randomized 4-arm non-inferiority trial where pre-test (visit 1) and/or return of results (visit 2) GC counseling was replaced with a patient-centered digital intervention. Arms include: A (GC/GC), B (GC/digital), C (digital/GC) and D (digital/digital). Primary outcomes were non-inferiority in uptake of genetic services and change in genetic knowledge and general anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure of results (T0-T2). Secondary cognitive and affective outcomes were assessed using non-inferiority ANOVAs and equivalency chi-squared tests in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Findings: 773 participants were recruited nationwide; 46.6% from rural areas. Mean age was 51 years (range 20-87), 13% male, 12% non-white, 29% had less than a college education, and 33% had a personal history of cancer. 584 (76%) patients completed testing (14% had a positive result, 16% had a VUS). In the primary ITT analyses, we met the non-inferiority for uptake of genetic services and anxiety, but results were inconclusive for knowledge. Secondary outcomes were heterogeneous across arms. Arm C demonstrated consistently favorable effects, while Arms B and D showed less favorable outcomes in select domains (e.g. satisfaction and MICRA). Patients who received positive or VUS results via digital disclosure had significantly higher MICRA scores - indicating greater negative response to testing. Interpretation: In this large, randomized trial of patients with and without cancer, the eREACH intervention was effective for pre-test counseling, but inconclusive for digital disclosure of results. Exploratory analyses suggest that digital delivery could be a reasonable alternative for individuals receiving negative results, while those receiving positive or VUS results may derive some short-term psychosocial benefit from GC disclosure.

Background. Accurate delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) - primary tumour (GTVp) and nodal disease (GTVn) - on FDG-PET/CT is a critical step of head and neck radiotherapy planning. Comparisons between lightweight custom networks and the auto-configured nnU-Net v2 are usually reported as end-to-end pipelines, conflating the contribution of the network with that of the inference-time post-processing applied on top of it. We separated the two. Methods. MiniUNet3D (custom 3D U-Net, 18.3 M parameters) and nnU-Net v2 (3d_fullres, 88.2 M parameters) were trained on the same 578 FDG-PET/CT cases (85/15 author-defined split of the HECKTOR 2025 Task 1 set, 8 centres) and evaluated on the same internal cohort. Three arms were compared pairwise: MiniUNet3D raw output at a fixed 0.5 threshold, MiniUNet3D with a locked adaptive post-processing pipeline, and nnU-Net v2. Comparisons used paired Wilcoxon tests with bootstrap confidence intervals, Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and Cohen's d; catastrophic failure (Dice < 0.01) was compared with an exact McNemar test. Cases with an empty reference for a given target were excluded from that target's analysis (n = 98 GTVp, n = 93 GTVn). Results. With post-processing matched off, nnU-Net v2 was superior: median GTVp Dice 0.799 versus 0.592 (mean difference -0.244, 95 % CI -0.300 to -0.191; d = -0.88) and GTVn 0.774 versus 0.598 (d = -0.82). Post-processing raised MiniUNet3D to 0.800 (GTVp) and 0.738 (GTVn), recovering 79 % of that difference. Post-processed, MiniUNet3D matched nnU-Net v2 on GTVp Dice (p = 0.113) but remained inferior on nodal disease after Bonferroni correction (Dice p = 0.041; surface Dice p = 0.049). Catastrophic GTVp failures were 25/98 raw, 8/98 post-processed and 1/98 for nnU-Net v2 (McNemar p = 0.016). Inference took 34 s versus 78 s per case on the same GPU. Conclusions. Post-processing recovered most, but not all, of the difference between the two models, and it did not confer robustness: an eight-fold higher rate of empty contours on small primaries persisted, which is the more consequential difference for planning safety. Pipeline comparisons reported without a post-processing ablation risk attributing to a network what post-processing supplied.

Prognostic models in oncology are developed one cancer at a time, from that cancer's own labelled outcomes, and fail where prognostic information is scarcest. Rare cancers account for roughly a fifth of diagnoses and most paediatric malignancies, yet seldom supply enough events for a reliable time-to-event model. We therefore asked whether a representation learned without outcome labels can supply what those cohorts cannot. A Transformer encoder was pretrained by masked field-value modelling on 9425135 tumour records from the SEER 17 registries, diagnosed in 2000 to 2023. Only diagnosis-time fields passing a fail-closed coding-verification gate were admitted, and each record was emitted as an era-specific and a harmonised view, keeping two decades of recoding auditable. The encoder was then frozen and read by a linear Cox head for overall survival. Nine rare cancers were removed from the pretraining corpus entirely, each requiring an independent pretraining run. On a sealed test partition, all nine exceeded an architecture-identical random frozen encoder in Harrell concordance by +0.0034 to +0.0368, every lower confidence limit above zero. At 256 labelled patients, all 67 cancers favoured the pretrained representation over budget-matched Cox regression, median difference +0.0283. The advantage was bounded: given the entire training set, Cox regression was favoured in seven of nine rare cancers. The encoder did not outperform a field-frequency baseline on its own objective, so upstream reconstruction did not predict downstream transfer. Outcome-agnostic registry pretraining carries prognostic signal into cancers it has never seen, and is most useful where labels are fewest, without establishing clinical utility.